Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.998
Filtrar
1.
Eur Psychiatry ; 67(1): e34, 2024 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDRs) are widely used in the treatment of anxiety and sleep disorders, but cognitive adverse effects have been reported in long-term use, and these may increase the risk of labor market marginalization (LMM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the risk of LMM is associated with new long-term BZDR use compared to short-term use. METHODS: This register-based nationwide cohort study from Finland included 37,703 incident BZDR users aged 18-60 years who initiated BZDR use in 2006. During the first year of use, BZDR users were categorized as long-term users (≥180 days) versus short-term users based on PRE2DUP method. The main outcome was LMM, defined as receipt of disability pension, long-term sickness absence (>90 days), or long-term unemployment (>180 days). The risk of outcomes was analyzed with Cox regression models, adjusted with sociodemographic background, somatic and psychiatric morbidity, other types of medication and previous sickness absence. RESULTS: During 5 years of follow-up, long-term use (34.4%, N = 12,962) was associated with 27% (adjusted Hazard Ratio, aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.23-1.31) increased risk of LMM compared with short-term use. Long-term use was associated with 42% (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34-1.50) increased risk of disability pension and 26% increased risk of both long-term unemployment and long-term sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that long-term use of BZDRs is associated with increased risk of dropping out from labor market. This may be partly explained by cognitive adverse effects of prolonged BZDR use, which should be taken into account when prescribing BZDRs.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Humanos , Finlandia/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-230678

RESUMEN

Objetivo El Síndrome Post-COVID o COVID Persistente ha afectado más de 240.000 trabajadores causando incapacidad laboral, de duración e intensidad variable y de valoración compleja. Para una mejor capacidad decisoria para valorar la capacidad/incapacidad laboral proponemos un protocolo de valoración de los síntomas más limitantes en relación con el trabajo. Material y Métodos: Se realizaron búsquedas en PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, de artículos publicados en 2021, y hasta marzo 2022, así como otras fuentes que se reseñan en bibliografía. Para el estudio de casos se escogieron procesos de IT que reunieran características de SPC, de más de 90 días analizando diversas variables. Conclusiones: Síndrome Post-COVID presenta síntomas que son factores de mal pronóstico para el retorno laboral. La valoración de la capacidad laboral requiere un protocolo específico de evaluación de las limitaciones funcionales y su traslación a diversas tareas que pueden estar comprometidas (AU)


Introduction: Post-COVID Syndrome or Persistent COVID has affected more than 240,000 workers, causing work disability of variable duration and intensity and complex assessment. Material and Methods: Searches were carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, for articles published in 2021, and until March 2022, as well as other sources reviewed in the bibliography. For the case study, IT processes were chosen that met SPC characteristics, lasting more than 90 days, analyzing various variables. Conclusions: Post-COVID Syndrome presents symptoms that are poor prognostic factors for returning to work. The assessment of work capacity requires a specific protocol for evaluating functional limitations and their translation to various tasks that may be compromised (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Reinserción al Trabajo
3.
Med. segur. trab ; 69(270): 40-48, 14 sept. 2023. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-225334

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Determinar la satisfacción laboral y el nivel de conocimiento sobre higiene postural como factores asocia-dos a incapacidad prolongada en lumbalgia.Métodos: Estudio transversal analítico en pacientes con incapacidad temporal de trabajo por lumbalgia, se inte-graron dos grupos, pacientes con incapacidad prolongada y pacientes con incapacidad no prolongada. El tamaño de la muestra fue 120 por grupo. La satisfacción laboral se evaluó mediante el instrumento adaptado basado en el cuestionario s21/26 y S4/82, para la higiene postural se utilizó el cuestionario sobre higiene postural de Borrás. El análisis estadístico incluyó t student, mann whitney y Chi2. Resultados: No se encontró asociación entre incapacidad prolongada y satisfacción laboral, en el grupo con in-capacidad prolongada 42.5% refieren estar bastante satisfechos y en el grupo sin incapacidad prolongada la pre-valencia es 35.0% (p=0.154). En el grupo con incapacidad prolongada el nivel de conocimiento bajo sobre higiene postural es 87.5% y en el grupo sin incapacidad prolongada el porcentaje es 68.5% (p=0.000). Conclusión: La satisfacción laboral no es factor asociado con incapacidad prolongada por lumbalgia, el nivel de conocimiento sobre higiene postural es factor asociado a incapacidad prolongada por lumbalgia (AU)


Objective: To determine job satisfaction and the level of knowledge about postural hygiene as factors associated with prolonged disability in low back pain.Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study in patients with temporary work disability due to low back pain, two groups were integrated, patients with prolonged disability and patients with non-prolonged disability. The sample size was 120 per group. Job satisfaction was evaluated using the adapted instrument based on the s21/26 and S4/82 questionnaire, for postural hygiene the Borrás postural hygiene questionnaire was used. Statistical analysis includ-ed t student, Mann Whitney and Chi2.Results: No significant association was found between prolonged disability and job satisfaction. In the group with prolonged disability, 42.5% reported being quite satisfied, and in the group without prolonged disability, the prev-alence was 35.0% (p=0.154).In the group with prolonged disability, the low level of knowledge about postural hygiene is 87.5% and in the group without prolonged disability, the percentage is 68.5%, a statistically significant difference (p=0.000).Conclusion: Job satisfaction is not a factor associated with prolonged disability due to low back pain, the level of knowledge about postural hygiene is a factor associated with prolonged disability due to low back pain (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Estudios Transversales
4.
N Engl J Med ; 388(9): 824-832, 2023 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By the end of 2022, nearly 20 million workers in the United States have gained paid-sick-leave coverage from mandates that require employers to provide benefits to qualified workers, including paid time off for the use of preventive services. Although the lack of paid-sick-leave coverage may hinder access to preventive care, current evidence is insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions about its relationship to cancer screening. METHODS: We examined the association between paid-sick-leave mandates and screening for breast and colorectal cancers by comparing changes in 12- and 24-month rates of colorectal-cancer screening and mammography between workers residing in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that have been affected by paid-sick-leave mandates (exposed MSAs) and workers residing in unexposed MSAs. The comparisons were conducted with the use of administrative medical-claims data for approximately 2 million private-sector employees from 2012 through 2019. RESULTS: Paid-sick-leave mandates were present in 61 MSAs in our sample. Screening rates were similar in the exposed and unexposed MSAs before mandate adoption. In the adjusted analysis, cancer-screening rates were higher among workers residing in exposed MSAs than among those in unexposed MSAs by 1.31 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 2.34) for 12-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.56 percentage points (95% CI, 0.33 to 2.79) for 24-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.22 percentage points (95% CI, -0.20 to 2.64) for 12-month mammography, and 2.07 percentage points (95% CI, 0.15 to 3.99) for 24-month mammography. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of private-sector workers in the United States, cancer-screening rates were higher among those residing in MSAs exposed to paid-sick-leave mandates than among those residing in unexposed MSAs. Our results suggest that a lack of paid-sick-leave coverage presents a barrier to cancer screening. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Obligatorios/economía , Programas Obligatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Obligatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Med. segur. trab ; 68(269): 209-220, oct-dic. 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-223517

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Conocer las características epidemiológicas de los pacientes con patología osteomuscular valorados para una incapacidad laboralMaterial y método: Se realiza un estudio descriptivo, transversal y retrospectivo en el que se incluyen 60.000 pacien-tes con patología musculoesquelética valorados para incapacidad laboral en el Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) en el año 2019. Se estudian las variables patología (codificación CIE-9), edad, género, comunidad au-tónoma (C. A.), ocupación profesional, régimen de afiliación a la seguridad social, forma de inicio del expediente de incapacidad, contingencia y resolución del expediente de incapacidad.Resultados: Los trastornos musculoesqueléticos (TME) más frecuentemente valorados en las unidades médicas de valoración de incapacidades (UMVI) son los del raquis lumbar (31,6%), el hombro (13,5%) y la rodilla (11,9%). Los TME que generan más incapacidad permanente (IP) son los de cadera y rodilla. Hombro y codo suponen más de 2/3 del total de las enfermedades profesionales por TME. El 87% de las calificaciones de IP por TME reciben el grado de Incapacidad Permanente Total (IPT). El porcentaje de denegaciones de IP es mayor en mujeres (61%) que en hombres (47%) y muy similar entre régimen general (54%) y autónomos (55%). Galicia es la C. A. con un mayor número de valoraciones por afiliado a la Seguridad Social y Canarias la de mayor número de IPT por afiliado a la Seguridad Social.Conclusiones: Los datos evidencian que la concesión de la IP es un proceso complejo en el que intervienen factores internos al individuo, pero también intervienen factores externos (AU)


Objective: To know the epidemiological characteristics of patients with osteomuscular pathology assessed for work disability.Material and methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study is carried out, including 60,000 pa-tients with musculoskeletal pathology assessed for work disability at the National Social Security Institute in 2019. They have been studied pathology ( CIE-9 code), age, gender, autonomous community, professional occupation, social security affiliation scheme, form of initiation of the disability file, contingency and resolution of the disability file variables. Conteined in data base ALFA from INSSResults: The most frequently musculoskeletal disorders assessed in the disability assessment medical units are those of the lumbar spine (31.6%), the shoulder (13.5%) and the knee (11.9%). The musculoskeletal disorders that generate more permanent disability are those of the hip and knee. Shoulder and elbow account for more than 2/3 of all occupational diseases due to musculoskeletal disorders. 87% of total permanent incapacity for work (PI) ratings by musculoskeletal disorders receive the grade of total permanent incapacity for work . The percentage of PI refusals is higher in women (61%) than in men (47%) and very similar between the general regime (54%) and the self-employed (55%). The occupations that generate more disability assessment consultations are those with the most physical requirements, wich are, service and industry workers and laborers. Galicia is the Autonomous Com-munity with the highest number of assessments per Social Security affiliate, and the Canary Islands the one with the highest number of IPT per Social Security affiliate. When relating the number of disabilities with the number of assessments of the Disability Assessment Medical Units, we observe that Canarias (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absentismo , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Seguridad Social , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Prevalencia
6.
Ludovica Pediatr ; 25(2): 18-26, dic.2022.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1414510

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los trabajadores de la salud (TS) poseen la mayor exposición laboral al contagio SARS-CoV-2. Los residentes forman parte fundamental de los servicios de salud por lo que no se encuentran exentos del impacto físico, psíquico, social y económico negativo producido por la pandemia por COVID-19. Objetivo: : Describir el impacto epidemiológico de la enfermedad profesional por COVID-19 en médicos residentes de pediatría. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal en médicos residentes de pediatría del H.I.A.E.P "Sor María Ludovica". El período comprendido en el estudio fue del 01/10/2020 al 30/09/2021. Se evaluaron los siguientes datos: género, edad, antecedentes personales, vacunación, cuadro clínico, métodos diagnósticos, aislamientos epidemiológicos, evolución y licencias tramitadas. Los datos fueron registrados por la jefatura de residentes. Resultados: 143 casos sospechosos de COVID-19, de ellos 30 resultaron confirmados de COVID-19. La edad media de los enfermos fue de 31 años (26-46 años) de los cuales 14 (47%) no estaban vacunados contra SARS COV-2, 11 (36%) estaban completamente inmunizados y 5 (17%) tenían calendario incompleto. 2 casos (6,6%) reportaron comorbilidad previa. Se realizaron pruebas de laboratorio en 130 de los 143 casos. 13 casos se descartaron por criterio clínico. La tasa de positividad fue 23,1%. 26 casos fueron confirmados por laboratorio y 4 casos mediante criterio clínico epidemiológico. Todos los casos fueron leves y evolucionaron favorablemente. Fueron gestionadas 326 licencias relacionadas a la pandemia por COVID-19 que significaron la pérdida de 2.830 días laborales. Conclusión: En el presente estudio se evidenció una alta tasa de incidencia de COVID-19 en residentes de pediatría en un año: 23,1%


Introduction: Health workers (HCWs) have the highest occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 contagion. Residents are a fundamental part of health services, so they are not exempt from the negative physical, psychological, social and economic impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives: To describe the epidemiological impact of the occupational disease by COVID-19 in resident pediatricians. Material and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study in pediatric residents of the H.I.A.E.P "Sor María Ludovica". The period covered by the study was from 10/01/2020 to 09/30/2021. The following data were evaluated: gender, age, personal history, vaccination, clinical picture, diagnostic methods, epidemiological isolates, evolution and licenses processed. The data was recorded by the head of residents. Results: 143 suspected cases of COVID-19, of which 30 were confirmed to be COVID-19. The mean age of the patients was 31 years (26-46 years), of which 14 (47%) were not vaccinated against SARS COV.-2, 11 (36%) were fully immunized and 5 (17%) had an incomplete schedule. 2 cases (6.6%) reported previous comorbidity. Laboratory tests were performed in 130 of the 143 cases. 13 cases were ruled out based on clinical criteria. The positivity rate was 23.1%. 26 cases were confirmed by laboratory and 4 cases by clinical epidemiological criteria. All cases were mild and evolved favorably. 326 licenses related to the COVID-19 pandemic were managed, which meant the loss of 2,830 working days. Conclusion: In the present study, a high rate of incidence of COVID-19 was evidenced in pediatric residents in one year: 23.1%


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Argentina/epidemiología , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Incidencia , Estudios Transversales , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263220, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113912

RESUMEN

Causes for employee absenteeism vary. The commonest cause of work absenteeism is "illness-related." Mongolia's capital city, Ulaanbaatar, experiences high employee absenteeism during the winter than during other seasons due to the combination of extreme cold and extreme air pollution. We identified direct and indirect costs of absenteeism attributed to air pollution among private-sector employees in Ulaanbaatar. Using a purposive sampling design, we obtained questionnaire data for 1,330 employees working for private-sector companies spanning six economic sectors. We conducted 26 employee focus groups and 20 individual employer in-depth interviews. We used both quantitative and qualitative instruments to characterize the direct and indirect costs of absence due to illnesses attributed to severe air pollution during wintertime. Female employees and employees with a young child at home were more likely to be absent. Respiratory diseases accounted for the majority of reported air pollution-related illnesses. All participants perceived that air pollution adversely affected their health. Individual employee direct costs related to absence totaled 875,000 MNT ($307.10) for an average of three instances of three-day illness-related absences during the winter. This sum included diagnostic and doctor visit-related, medication costs and hospitalization costs. Non-healthcare-related direct cost (transportation) per absence was 50,000₮ ($17.60). Individual indirect costs included the value of lost wages for the typical 3-day absence, amounting to 120,000₮ ($42.10). These total costs to employees, therefore, may amount to as much as 10% of annual income. The majority of sick absences were unpaid. Overall, the cost of wintertime absences is substantial and fell disproportionately on female employees with young children.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Costo de Enfermedad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Sector Privado/economía , Estaciones del Año , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Adulto , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mongolia , Investigación Cualitativa , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263810, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trajectory analyses are being increasingly used in efforts to increase understanding about the heterogeneity in the development of different longitudinal outcomes such as sickness absence, use of medication, income, or other time varying outcomes. However, several methodological and interpretational challenges are related to using trajectory analyses. This methodological study aimed to compare results using two different types of software to identify trajectories and to discuss methodological aspects related to them and the interpretation of the results. METHODS: Group-based trajectory models (GBTM) and latent class growth models (LCGM) were fitted, using SAS and Mplus, respectively. The data for the examples were derived from a representative sample of Spanish workers in Catalonia, covered by the social security system (n = 166,192). Repeatedly measured sickness absence spells per trimester (n = 96,453) were from the Catalan Institute of Medical Evaluations. The analyses were stratified by sex and two birth cohorts (1949-1969 and 1970-1990). RESULTS: Neither of the software were superior to the other. Four groups were the optimal number of groups in both software, however, we detected differences in the starting values and shapes of the trajectories between the two software used, which allow for different conclusions when they are applied. We cover questions related to model fit, selecting the optimal number of trajectory groups, investigating covariates, how to interpret the results, and what are the key pitfalls and strengths of using these person-oriented methods. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies could address further methodological aspects around these statistical techniques, to facilitate epidemiological and other research dealing with longitudinal study designs.


Asunto(s)
Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cohorte de Nacimiento , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Seguridad Social , Programas Informáticos , España/epidemiología
9.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2280, 2022 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35145176

RESUMEN

This study assesses the potential of workplace-based micro-exercise (brief and simple exercise bouts) to prevent long-term sickness absence (LTSA) at the population level. In the Work Environment and Health in Denmark Study (2012-2018), we followed 70,130 workers from the general working population, without prior LTSA, for two years in the Danish Register for Evaluation of Marginalisation. We used Cox regression with model-assisted weights and controlled for various confounders. From 2012 to 2018, the percentage of workers in Denmark using workplace-based micro-exercise during and outside of working hours increased from 7.1 to 10.9% and from 0.8 to 1.4%, respectively. The incidence of long-term sickness absence (at least 30 days) was 8.4% during follow-up. The fully adjusted model showed reduced risk of long-term sickness absence from using micro-exercise during working hours, (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96), but not when used outside of working hours. If used by all workers, micro-exercise during working hours could potentially prevent 12.8% of incident long-term sickness absence cases (population attributable fraction). In conclusion, micro-exercise performed during working hours holds certain potential to prevent incident long-term sickness absence in the general working population. Large-scale implementation of workplace-based micro-exercise may represent an unexploited opportunity for public health promotion.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Promoción de la Salud , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Sistema de Registros , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo , Adolescente , Adulto , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
10.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 6(4): 240-248, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many adolescents have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic either directly by being infected with the virus or indirectly by lockdowns and restrictions influencing normal living. We aimed to investigate health, including symptoms of long COVID, in adolescents (aged 15-18 years) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared with a control group. METHODS: LongCOVIDKidsDK was a national, cross-sectional study carried out in Denmark, which included SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents and matched controls. All Danish adolescents aged 15-18 years with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during the period Jan 1, 2020, to July 12, 2021, and a control group matched (1:4) by age and sex were sent a survey from July 20, 2021. Participants had until Sept 15, 2021, to respond. Symptoms associated with COVID-19, school attendance, and health-related quality of life were investigated using ancillary questions and validated questionnaires (Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] and Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory-24 [CSSI-24]). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04786353. FINDINGS: 24 315 adolescents with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (case group) and 97 257 matched controls were invited to participate. 3013 matched controls were excluded because of suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. 6630 (27·3%) responded in the case group and 21 640 (22·3%) responded and were eligible to participate in the control group. Across both groups, median age was 17·6 years (IQR 16·4-18·5), 16 277 (57·6%) of 28 270 responders were female, and 11 993 (42·4%) were male. Participants in the case group had greater odds of having at least one long COVID symptom lasting at least 2 months compared with the control group (3159 [61·9%] vs 12 340 [57·0%], odds ratio 1·22 [95% CI 1·15-1·30]; p<0·0001). Participants in the case group reported significantly lower symptom scores (ie, less somatic distress) on the CSSI-24 than in the control group: mean 10·7 (SD 11·4, median 7·0 [IQR 2·0-15·0]) versus 11·9 (10·6, 9·0 [4·0-17·0]; p<0·0001). Participants in the case group had better quality of life scores on the PedsQL than in the control group: physical functioning mean score 88·7 (SD 13·9, median 93·8 [IQR 84·4-100·0]) versus 86·5 (14·3, 90·6 [81·3-96·9]; p<0·0001); emotional functioning 77·1 (20·3, 80·0 [65·0-95·0]) versus 71·7 (21·4, 75·0 [60·0-90·0]; p<0·0001); social functioning 93·1 (12·5, 100·0 [90·0-100·0]) versus 88·4 (16·2, 95·0 [80·0-100·0]; p<0·0001); and school functioning 66·9 (22·5, 65·0 [60·0-85·0]) versus 62·9 (22·1, 65·0 [50·0-80·0]; p<0·0001). More participants in the case group than in the control group reported 16 or more sick days (1205 [18·2%] vs 2518 [11·6%]; p<0·0001) and 16 or more days of school absence (695 [10·5%] vs 1777 [8·2%]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Participants with SARS-CoV-2-positive tests had more long-lasting symptoms and sick leave, whereas participants in the control group had more short-lasting symptoms and worse quality of life. Knowledge of long COVID in adolescents is important to guide clinical recognition and management of this condition. FUNDING: AP Møller and Chastine McKinney Møller Foundation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Adolescente , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Instituciones Académicas , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19
11.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262458, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35015789

RESUMEN

AIM: Earlier research has revealed a strong relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The aim of this review was to explore and uncover this relationship by looking at differences in type of design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal), type of data (self-reported vs. registered data), and type of sickness absence (long-term vs. short term). METHOD: Six databases were searched through June 2020. Observational and experimental studies from 1980 to 2020, in English or Scandinavian languages reporting the results of the association between alcohol consumption and sickness absence among working population were included. Quality assessment, and statistical analysis focusing on differences in the likelihood of sickness absence on subgroup levels were performed on each association, not on each study. Differences in the likelihood of sickness absence were analyzed by means of meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018112078. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies (58% longitudinal) including 439,209 employees (min. 43, max. 77,746) from 15 countries were included. Most associations indicating positive and statistically significant results were based on longitudinal data (70%) and confirmed the strong/causal relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The meta-analysis included eight studies (ten samples). The increased risk for sickness absence was likely to be found in cross-sectional studies (OR: 8.28, 95% CI: 6.33-10.81), studies using self-reported absence data (OR: 5.16, 95% CI: 3.16-8.45), and those reporting short-term sickness absence (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 2.73-8.60). CONCLUSION: This review supports, but also challenges earlier evidence on the association between alcohol use and sickness absence. Certain types of design, data, and types of sickness absence may produce large effects. Hence, to investigate the actual association between alcohol and sickness absence, research should produce and review longitudinal designed studies using registry data and do subgroup analyses that cover and explain variability of this association.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(2): 134-142, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate an integrated mental healthcare and vocational rehabilitation intervention to improve and hasten the process of return-to-work of people on sick leave with anxiety and depression. METHODS: In this three-arm, randomised trial, participants were assigned to (1) integrated intervention (INT), (2) improved mental healthcare (MHC) or (3) service as usual (SAU). The primary outcome was time to return-to-work measured at 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were time to return-to-work measured at 6-month follow-up; levels of anxiety, depression, stress symptoms, and social and occupational functioning at 6 months; and return-to-work measured as proportion in work at 12 months. RESULTS: 631 individuals were randomised. INT yielded a higher proportion in work compared with both MHC (56.2% vs 43.7%, p=0.012) and SAU (56.2% vs 45%, p=0.029) at 12-month follow-up. We found no differences in return-to-work in terms of sick leave duration at either 6-month or 12-month follow-up, with the latter being the primary outcome. No differences in anxiety, depression or functioning between INT, MHC and SAU were identified, but INT and MHC showed lower scores on Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale compared with SAU at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although INT did not hasten the process of return-to-work, it yielded better outcome with regard to proportion in work compared with MHC and SAU. The findings suggest that INT compared with SAU is associated with a few, minor health benefits. Overall, INT yielded slightly better vocational and health outcomes, but the clinical significance of the health advantage is questionable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02872051.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/rehabilitación , Depresión/rehabilitación , Rehabilitación Vocacional/métodos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Psicológico
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 85-91, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695641

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain is an important public health problem, generating high financial and social costs. While most clinical guidelines stress the importance of managing low back pain in primary care, in practice a disproportionate amount of patients with low back pain present to emergency departments. Patients presenting to emergency departments may form a specific group with different factors leading to chronicity. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the sociodemographic and psychological predictors of persistent low back pain and the length of sick leave due to pain in patients with acute symptoms visiting an emergency department. METHODS: Patients with a first episode of non-specific acute low back pain in at least three months were qualified for this study. The participants filled a battery of questionnaires, including measures of pain, pain-related disability, depression, anxiety and pain coping strategies. A structured telephone interview was performed after three months with questions regarding pain and the length of sick leave. RESULTS: 110 patients participated in the study. 97 patients completed the follow-up, with 70.1% suffering from pain after three months. Lower self-rated health predicted pain after three months. Longer length of sick leave was predicted by lower self-rated health, distraction as a coping strategy and decreased behavioral activity. CONCLUSION: Because of its simplicity, a measurement of self-rated health may be included in future clinical practice for assessing the risk of persistent pain.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Estado de Salud , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(3): 176-183, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462304

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify occupational risks of COVID-19 among healthcare staff during the first wave (9 March 2020-31 July 2020) of the pandemic in England. METHODS: We used pseudonymised data on 902 813 individuals employed by 191 National Health Service trusts to explore demographic and occupational risk factors for sickness absence ascribed to COVID-19 (n=92 880). We estimated ORs by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: With adjustment for employing trust, demographic characteristics and previous frequency of sickness absence, risk relative to administrative/clerical occupations was highest in 'additional clinical services' (care assistants and other occupations directly supporting those in clinical roles) (OR 2.31 (2.25 to 2.37)), registered nursing and midwifery professionals (OR 2.28 (2.23 to 2.34)) and allied health professionals (OR 1.94 (1.88 to 2.01)) and intermediate in doctors and dentists (OR 1.55 (1.50 to 1.61)). Differences in risk were higher after the employing trust had started to care for documented patients with COVID-19, and were reduced, but not eliminated, following additional adjustment for exposure to infected patients or materials, assessed by a job-exposure matrix. For prolonged COVID-19 sickness absence (episodes lasting >14 days), the variation in risk by staff group was somewhat greater. CONCLUSIONS: After allowance for possible bias and confounding by non-occupational exposures, we estimated that relative risks for COVID-19 among most patient-facing occupations were between 1.5 and 2.5. The highest risks were in those working in additional clinical services, nursing and midwifery and in allied health professions. Better protective measures for these staff groups should be a priority. COVID-19 may meet criteria for compensation as an occupational disease in some healthcare occupations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN36352994.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Empleos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal
15.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260453, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919570

RESUMEN

A majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections are transmitted from a minority of infected subjects, some of which may be symptomatic or pre-symptomatic. We aimed to quantify potential infectiousness among asymptomatic healthcare workers (HCWs) in relation to prior or later symptomatic disease. We previously (at the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic) performed a cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infections among 27,000 healthcare workers (HCWs) at work in the capital region of Sweden. We performed both SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and serology. Furthermore, the cohort was comprehensively followed for sick leave, both before and after sampling. In the present report, we used the cohort database to quantify potential infectiousness among HCWs at work. Those who had sick leave either before or after sampling were classified as post-symptomatic or pre-symptomatic, whereas the virus-positive subjects with no sick leave were considered asymptomatic. About 0.2% (19/9449) of HCW at work were potentially infectious and pre-symptomatic (later had disease) and 0.17% (16/9449) were potentially infectious and asymptomatic (never had sick leave either before nor after sampling). Thus, 33% and 28% of all the 57 potentially infectious subjects were pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic, respectively. When a questionnaire was administered to HCWs with past infection, only 10,5% of HCWs had had no indication at all of having had SARS-CoV-2 infection ("truly asymptomatic"). Our findings provide a unique quantification of the different groups of asymptomatic, potentially infectious HCWs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suecia/epidemiología
16.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260652, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882720

RESUMEN

Healthcare and residential care workers represent two occupational groups that have, in particular, been at risk of Covid-19, its long-term consequences, and related sick leave. In this study, we investigated the predictors of prolonged sick leave among healthcare and residential workers due to non-hospitalized Covid-19 in the early period of the pandemic. This study is based on a patient register (n = 3209) and included non-hospitalized healthcare or residential care service workers with a positive RT- PCR for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 433) between March and August 2020. Data such as socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and the length of sick leave because of Covid-19 and prior to the pandemic were extracted from the patient's electronic health records. Prolonged sick leave was defined as sick leave ≥ 3 weeks, based on the Swedish pandemic policy. A generalized linear model was used with a binary distribution, adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidity in order to predict prolonged sick leave. Of 433 (77% women) healthcare and residential care workers included in this study, 14.8% needed longer sick leave (> 3 weeks) due to Covid-19. Only 1.4% of the subjects were on sick leave because of long Covid. The risk of sick leave was increased two-fold among residential care workers (adjusted RR 2.14 [95% CI 1.31-3.51]). Depression/anxiety (adjusted RR 2.09 [95% CI 1.31-3.34]), obesity (adjusted RR 1.96 [95% CI 1.01-3.81]) and dyspnea at symptom onset (adjusted RR 2.47 [95% CI 1.55-3.92]), sick leave prior to the pandemic (3-12 weeks) (adjusted RR 2.23 [95% CI 1.21-4.10]) were associated with longer sick leave. From a public health perspective, considering occupational category, comorbidity, symptoms at onset, and sick leave prior to the pandemic as potential predictors of sick leave in healthcare may help prevent staff shortage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , COVID-19/virología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/diagnóstico , Disnea/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Suecia/epidemiología
17.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(23): 7218-7222, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919220

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Anti-COVID-19 vaccines were mainly associated with non-serious adverse events (AEs), whose prevalence was reported to be up to 70% in healthcare workers (HCWs). This may lead to sick leave requests, but this impact has never been quantified. This study aimed to investigate the absence from work among HCWs following anti-COVID-19 vaccination. Its association with age and previous COVID-19 infection was also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cross-sectional study on administrative data about sick leave requests after anti-COVID-19 vaccination. All the HCWs employed at the Niguarda Hospital (Milan, Italy) who received the vaccine from December 27, 2020 to February 28, 2021 were included. RESULTS: In total, 4,088 HCWs received the first dose of the vaccine and 4,043 completed the vaccination cycle. After the first injection, 1.6% of HCWs requested sick leave, while after the second injection, the number of requests significantly increased (+6.1%, p<0.001). A significant increase in sick leave was detected for those who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first injection (+2.3%, p<0.001). After the second dose, a significant increase in sick leave was observed in the 20-30-year-old group compared to >30 years (+3.6%, p=0.017), if HCWs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The requests for sick leave among HCWs following the anti-COVID-19 vaccine were limited and higher after the second injection. This may help the management of the human resources when the large-scale administration of the anti-COVID-19 vaccines will involve other categories of workers.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
19.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 141(10): 907-914, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The retrospective study showed that the effect of the middle ear pressure treatment by the tramstympanic membrane massage (TMM) device was similar to that of the Meniett device. OBJECTIVES: The new TMM device named EFET device was prospectively evaluated in patients with Meniere's disease (MD) and delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH) and we compared the effects to the Meniett device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 ears of 19 patients were treated with an EFET device, and 17 ears of 15 patients were treated with the Meniett device. All patients suffering from intractable MD and DEH were treated for 4 months. The insertion of a transtympanic ventilation tube was necessary for the Meniett device, but not the EFET device. RESULTS: In patients treated by the EFET and Meniett devices, the frequency of vertigo significantly improved after treatment. The distribution of vertigo outcomes at 4 months after treatment did not differ between patients treated with the both devices. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Middle ear pressure treatment by the EFET device is effective and provides minimally invasive options for intractable MD and DEH like the Meniett device.


Asunto(s)
Hidropesía Endolinfática/terapia , Enfermedad de Meniere/terapia , Otolaringología/instrumentación , Tratamiento de Micropresión Transtimpánica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nistagmo Patológico/etiología , Nistagmo Patológico/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Vértigo/etiología , Vértigo/terapia
20.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 25(4): 393-402, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543170

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify sick leave days (SLD) predictors after starting antidepressant (AD) treatment in patients affected by major depressive disorder (MDD), managed by general practitioners, with a focus on different AD therapeutic approaches. METHODS: Retrospective study on German IQVIA® Disease Analyser database. 19-64 year old MDD patients initiating AD treatment between July-2016 and June-2018 were grouped by therapeutic approach (AD monotherapy versus combination/switch/add-on). Data were analysed descriptively by AD therapeutic approach, while a zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) multiple regression model was run to evaluate SLD predictors. RESULTS: 8,891 patients met inclusion criteria (monotherapy: 66%; combination/switch/add-on: 34%). All covariates had an influence on SLD after AD treatment initiation. Focussing on variables that physicians may more easily intervene to improve outcomes, it was found that the expected SLD number of combination/switch/add-on patients was 1.6 times that of monotherapy patients, and the expected SLD number of patients diagnosed with MDD before the decision to start AD treatment was 1.2 times that of patients not diagnosed with MDD. CONCLUSIONS: A patient tailored approach in the selection of AD treatment at the time of MDD diagnosis may improve functional recovery and help to reduce the socio-economic burden of the disease.KEY POINTSFew studies previously investigated the effect of antidepressant treatment approaches on sick leave days in major depressive disorder.To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the effect of different antidepressant treatment approaches on sick leave days in major depressive disorder in German patients.Patients receiving antidepressant monotherapy treatment seemed to lose fewer working days than patients receiving antidepressants combination/switch/add-on therapy, both before and after starting treatment, even if differences were more pronounced after treatment has started.The use of antidepressant monotherapy or combination/switch/add-on therapy was the strongest predictor of sick leave days after starting antidepressant treatment: the expected number of sick leave days for the combination/switch/add-on group was 1.6 times that of the monotherapy group.Among factors associated with increased sick leave days, antidepressant therapeutic approach and the promptness of starting the antidepressant treatment when major depressive disorder is diagnosed, are those on which physicians may more easily intervene to improve outcomes.Findings from the present study suggest that a patient tailored approach may improve functional recovery and help reducing the socio-economic burden of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina General , Alemania , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...